Archive for the ‘"culture wars"’ Category

Changing Face of Catholic Youth

Monday, January 18th, 2010

Virgen_de_guadalupe1This just in… at least in my world.

I don’t normally talk about ministry here—it’s true—and maybe I should more often, but this was too amazing for me to pass up.  I wanted to share with “the world” (that is, all 3 of my faithful readers) what I learned this past week.  According to Instituto Fe y Vida (Faith and Life Institute, a highly useful clearing house for information about Hispanic ministry): the majority of Catholic Youth in the United States (ages 0-30) are Hispanic.

You might be thinking big deal, but consider it again.  The majority!  And they are growing.  Seriously.  They generally have larger families and their numbers increase continually through immigration.  Regardless of what you think about immigration laws in this country, this is a huge deal for the Church.  The reality is there, and a lot of organizations have a lot of great stuff on paper (all of our seminarians are supposed to learn Spanish, for instance) but is that happening?

There’s a wonderful opportunity in all of this, for the renewal of religious congregations and their ministries as well as for the possiblity of an influx of vocations—if only we can encourage them before it’s too late.  Consider all the Irish vocations in the U.S. Church of the past, where every 3rd priest was named McDermott!

I’m doing some research about all of this… and hopefully I’ll have some more to say as the semester progresses.

Our Lady of Guadalupe, Patroness of All the Americas… Pray for us.

  • Share/Bookmark

Environmentalism and Birth Control

Monday, August 24th, 2009

Recent discussion at Aquinas Institute over care of the environment reminded me of yet another contradiction in our society that desperately wants to go “green”:

AB over at Gift of Self said it better than I can—almost two years ago—in a post called “Going Green and the Pill”.  She notes, for example, the discrepancy between our over-sensitization to the kinds of food we put in our bodies (like concern for having organic everything—from milk to tomatoes to toothpaste) and the kinds of things women put in their bodies to prevent pregnancies.  She offers a couple of examples from the media of the harmful effects of high levels of estrogen on water supplies and fish populations.

… … …

On a slightly different note, but still about contraception, a quote I found particularly compelling comes from Archbishop Charles Chaput of Denver quoted in First Things by Mary Eberstadt [Aug/Sept 2008, no. 185, p 40]:

Contraception has released males—to a historically unprecedented degree—from responsibility for their sexual aggression.

There is some food for thought.

  • Share/Bookmark

The “But, He Did It Last Week and You Didn’t Say Anything…” Argument

Wednesday, May 6th, 2009

One of the more popular arguments I hear from those who think a “certain segment of the Catholic population” has gone off the deep end for opposing the Notre Dame invite/honors to President Obama goes along these lines:

Jeremy is a 12-year old boy in the 7th grade.  He and his friends like to smoke cigarettes after school, and his mother, who has told him repeatedly how she wants him never to smoke, suspects it to be the case since she can sometimes smell the smoke in his clothes when she washes them.  His friend, Johnny, gets the cigarettes from his dad, who doesn’t seem to mind when they smoke in the backyard while he is in the den reading the paper.  But, one day Jeremy comes home and forgets to change before he goes down for dinner.  His mother smells the smoke and erupts with anger and surprise, “Jeremy!  Have you been smoking!?  I told you not to smoke, ever!”  Jeremy replies, “Mom, Johnny’s dad doesn’t care if we smoke, so why does it matter?”  She replies, “Well, I am your mother and I told you I don’t want you smoking!”  Jeremy chimes in like any good pre-teen: “But, Mom, when Anthony [his older brother] smoked you didn’t care!  And, after all, you smoked when you were a kid!

Or, maybe it’s like this:

Jeremy is a 17-year old Junior in high school.  He smokes a lot, even in front of his mother, whom he knows does not approve.  But, when she sees him doing it, she won’t tell him to stop.  She can’t understand why after all the years of raising him not to smoke or do drugs or drink, he is a heavy smoker.  One evening, as she is in the kitchen preparing dinner, Jeremy comes downstairs and lights up in front of her.  She snaps and grabs the cigarette from his mouth and throws it in the sink.  She yells, “I don’t want you to smoke ever again!  This is bad for you Jeremy!  Didn’t I raise you better than this!?”  Jeremy, like any good teenager replies, “Mom, I’ve been smoking since I was 13, you’ve never said a word about it. What’s the deal?  If you were so upset, why didn’t you say something before?

Now, I have to ask you… is this any kind of argument at all?  Really?  Do any of the real facts that Jeremy points out change what Jeremy did or justify his disobeying the clear prohibition of his mother?

  • Share/Bookmark

Disputatio?

Saturday, May 2nd, 2009

Fellow AI student, Jen, at Jen’s Journal has posted a commentary on the fiasco at Notre Dame. In the spirit of disputatio, I replied to her post, which should be read before my comments. I had not planned on commenting on this issue, as there is plenty of back-and-forth going on already, but Jen’s post inspired me to throw my lot in and make the distinctions I think are necessary in this case.

Here is a summary of points I think need to be distinguished (I go into more detail in my comments):

1) Preventing President Obama from speaking at Notre Dame is not about freedom of speech.

2) A University commencement speech is not the proper environment for a “disputatio” of any kind. There’s no time for sed contras or objections.

3) The president is not only going to speak at commencement, he is going to receive an honorary degree of Doctor of Law.

4) The USCCB stated some time ago as a body that Catholic institutions should not give honors to those who oppose the Church’s teachings.

5) President Obama is to receive an honorary doctorate in law, which is the very thing—U.S. Law—he is using to promote the destruction of unborn life.

6) This is not an all-or-nothing debate. It is not about ecumenism or bi-partisanism.

There are really only a couple of issues on the table here:

a) are the bishops to be obeyed in their moratorium on honors to those who oppose the Church’s moral teachings?
b) what is the proper setting for a dialogue between the Church, its supporters, and those who oppose it?

  • Share/Bookmark

Who Told You These Lies?

Wednesday, April 8th, 2009

I’d rather be writing about other things, but I can’t resist letting this one go by without spreading the word.  So tired, indeed, of lies, ambiguities, and over-simplifications.

If ever there were a cause for making distinctions, this ought to be one of them.  Fr. Philip Neri Powell, OP at Domine, da mihi hanc aquam points out this article: “Bleak stories behind failed condom campaigns” on the recent media firestorm over Pope Benedict’s comments about condoms and AIDS in Africa.  Written by a Nigerian, Chinwuba Iyizoba, the article suggests that those in the First World media who find it so easy to claim scientific high ground have failed to understand African culture and the real problems that cause the spread of HIV/AIDS—that the only successful method inevitably (and in the case of Uganda, has been) will be the promotion and teaching of abstinence: a change in behavior.

At the heart of the ‘controversy’, I think, is the ubiquitous and inexorable epidemic of arrogance thinly veiled behind a false compassion.  This arrogance is hidden to those of us who wield it because we convince ourselves that we know more and therefore should help, and are better qualified to help those we deem to be less fortunate.  No one will deny that the AIDS epidemic is a tragedy, but how many more will look the other way and deny that the behavior that causes it—that behavior that promotes the use of human persons, especially women—is indeed a greater tragedy?  

But the desire to spread condom technology across Africa as the great panacea, the Deus ex machina of Western Civilization is evidence, I say, of that same imperialism that we condemn in our own history: that desire to spread capitalism whither it shall go, that only through free-market economies will indigenous peoples rise up and become actors on the global stage.  When will we get over ourselves?  How amazing is it that we can feel so guilty about what our ancestors did to other cultures in the past, yet at the same time perpetuate their crimes under a banner of false humility?

  • Share/Bookmark

Holy Cross Superior General Writes to President

Saturday, April 4th, 2009

The Superior General of the Holy Cross Fathers and Brothers, Fr. Hugh W. Cleary, C.S.C., has written a rather long letter to President Obama concerning the controversy over his upcoming appearance at the University of Notre Dame’s Commencement.  The letter can be read in its entirety here at Catholic News Agency.

I recommend reading it… to anyone who has been scandalized by the invitation, or, on the other hand, anyone who “just doesn’t see the big deal.”  I think Fr. Cleary presents some formidable points.  It is a very firm, thoughtful yet respectful letter, and it vaguely reminds me of the apologia Justin Martyr sent to the Emperor Antoninus in the 2nd Century.

  • Share/Bookmark